Accepting Abundance is a group website where new writers and new converts share their stories of living Catholicism, the joys and the struggles, the questions and the answers, the lifelong journey of conversion. Writing is an effective way to evangelize and to discover yourself, to communicate with an audience and, at the same time, push [...]
If you are interested in joining this website, please email Stacy Trasancos at email@example.com. I do not have a launch date yet, but am planning to get this organized and off the ground as soon as possible. Thank you.
Enter your email address to subscribe to our posts. They will be sent to your inbox for your convenience.
When Justice Harry A. Blackmun asked whether Mrs. Weddington felt there is any “inconsistency” in Court decisions against the “death penalty with respect to convicted murderers and rapists at one end of lifespan, and [her] position in this case at the other end of lifespan,” she replied that it has “never been established that the fetus is a person or that it’s entitled to the Fourteenth Amendment rights or the protection of the constitution.” It was clear to the court, even back then, that the case depended on the “fetus” having “constitutional rights.”
Justice Potter Stewart pressed further, “Well, if it were established that an unborn fetus is a person within the protection of the Fourteenth Amendment, you would have almost an impossible case here, would you not?” Mrs. Weddington replied, “I would have a very difficult case.” And then she laughed nervously. Justice Stewart, not laughing at all, continued that this is akin to ruling that if a ”mother thought that it bothered her health having the child around, she could have it killed.” Mrs. Weddington said, “That’s correct,” and declined any further response.
Our laws still, chillingly, reflect this inconsistency. On the one hand, we have the almost decade long 2004 Unborn Victims of Violence Act which federally recognizes a “child in utero” as a legal “victim” if he or she is injured or killed by crimes of violence, and laws such as the one decided in Alabama this month that recognize “unborn children are persons with rights that should be protected by law.” On the other hand, we have abortion for all nine months of pregnancy and impunity for the ones that kill those children, children who are not even guaranteed the protections given to convicted murderers and rapists in some states. It was not funny 40 years ago, and it is still no laughing matter. These are children being killed. Aren’t children people too?
Accepting Abundance is a group website where new writers and new converts share their stories of living Catholicism, the joys and the struggles, the questions and the answers, the lifelong... Read More